Cruise: 58JH20190515 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2021.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2021 Successor: GLODAPv2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: 58JH20190515; 58JH20190515
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment version is immutable and published in GLODAPv2.2021! Click here to switch to new version (GLODAPv2.2021)
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
co2_comparison_58JH20190515_unadj.png | View | ||
diffo.png | View | ||
diffo2.png | View | ||
tracer_complete_nocfc11.png | View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:8
cfc12:1
cruise:4
nitrate:12
oxygen:24
ph:8
phosphate:9
salinity:13
silicate:11
tco2:11
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
316N20020530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
58AA20010527_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
58GS20030922_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
58GS20060721_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
58GS20090528_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
58GS20130717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
58GS20160802_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
58JH19980801_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
58JH19990615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
58JH20000527_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
74JC19960720_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
77DN20020420_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
58JH20190515 - salinity
Clearly a trend present. OK fit with the most recent crs from '16. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:57:24 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
316N20020530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
58AA20010527_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
58GS20030922_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
58GS20060721_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
58GS20090528_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
58GS20130717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
58GS20160802_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
58JH19970414_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
74JC19960720_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
77DN20020420_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
58JH20190515 - tco2
Higher offsets can be due to 1) small trend and 2) a set off rather high samples
around 2500m depth. The most recent crs shows an acceptable offset. Note that
generally data is simply spready. Not enough for an adjustment. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:56:19 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
316N20020530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
58AA20010527_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
58GS20090528_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
58GS20130717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
58GS20160802_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
58JH19980801_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
77DN20020420_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
58JH20190515 - alkalinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:58:07 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
316N20020530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
58GS20090528_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
58GS20130717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
58GS20160802_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
58JH19980801_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
58JH20190515ph_offset.png | View | ||
74JC19960720_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
58JH20190515 - ph
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:58:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
58JH20190515 - phosphate
Very spready data but just as spready as surrounding cruises… no reasons to
think of a systematic bias. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:57:04 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
316N20020530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
58GS20030922_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
58GS20060721_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
58GS20090528_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
58GS20130717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
58GS20160802_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
58JH19941028_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
58JH19960720_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
58JH19990615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
58JH20000527_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
77DN20020420_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
58JH20190515 - nitrate
Very spready data but just as spready as sourrounding cruises… no reasons to
think of a systematic bias. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:56:47 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
316N20020530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
58GS20090528_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
58GS20130717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
58GS20160802_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
58JH19931106_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
58JH19941028_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
74JC19960720_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
77DN20020420_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
58JH20190515 - phosphate
Very spready data but just as spready as surrounding cruises… no reasons to
think of a systematic bias. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:57:04 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
316N20020530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
58AA19980308_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
58GS20060721_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
58GS20090528_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
58GS20130717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
58GS20160802_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
58JH19960720_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
58JH19990615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
58JH20000527_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
77DN20020420_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
58JH20190515 - silicate
Strong trend present but with most recent cruises OK'ish fit. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:57:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18HU19820228_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
316N19810401_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
316N20020530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
58AA19940826_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
58GS20090528_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
58JH19931106_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
58JH19941028_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
58JH19950427_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
58JH19951108_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
58JH19990615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
58JH20000527_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
58JH20190515 - oxygen
CTD data were off only ... bottle data look good, i.e. fit in the trend.
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-20 09:01:33 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
58JH20190515 - oxygen
All crs indicate clearly too low concentrations constant in depth. An additional
analysis on pressure surfaces below 2000m confirms these findings. Adjust
upward.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:56:36 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
CFC-12-saturation.png | View |
View comment(s) (filtered by cfc12 in subject)
58JH20190515 - cfc12
CFC_12 (and SF6) data have been updated and improved
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-06-17 07:56:23 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
58JH20190515 - cfc12
Extremely high values both shown in the surface saturation as well as in the
upper (roughly) 1500m. Similar concentrations shown for SF6. Adjust downward (?)
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:57:42 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
View 12 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
58JH20190515 - cfc12
CFC_12 (and SF6) data have been updated and improved
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-06-17 07:56:23 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
58JH20190515 - oxygen
CTD data were off only ... bottle data look good, i.e. fit in the trend.
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-20 09:01:33 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
58JH20190515 - ph
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:58:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
58JH20190515 - alkalinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:58:07 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
58JH20190515 - cfc12
Extremely high values both shown in the surface saturation as well as in the
upper (roughly) 1500m. Similar concentrations shown for SF6. Adjust downward (?)
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:57:42 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
58JH20190515 - salinity
Clearly a trend present. OK fit with the most recent crs from '16. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:57:24 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
58JH20190515 - silicate
Strong trend present but with most recent cruises OK'ish fit. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:57:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
58JH20190515 - phosphate
Very spready data but just as spready as surrounding cruises… no reasons to
think of a systematic bias. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:57:04 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
58JH20190515 - nitrate
Very spready data but just as spready as sourrounding cruises… no reasons to
think of a systematic bias. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:56:47 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
58JH20190515 - oxygen
All crs indicate clearly too low concentrations constant in depth. An additional
analysis on pressure surfaces below 2000m confirms these findings. Adjust
upward.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:56:36 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
58JH20190515 - tco2
Higher offsets can be due to 1) small trend and 2) a set off rather high samples
around 2500m depth. The most recent crs shows an acceptable offset. Note that
generally data is simply spready. Not enough for an adjustment. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-06 14:56:19 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
58JH20190515 - initialized
original: 58JH20190515; Unknown; Henrik Søiland; NN
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-03-29 16:01:52 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021
Hide comments