Cruise: 18LU20180218 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2021.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: 18LU20180218; 18LU20180218
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2021!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
co2_comparison_18LU20180218_unadj.png | View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
cruise:1
nitrate:9
oxygen:10
phosphate:9
salinity:10
silicate:10
tco2:10
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
18LU20180218 - salinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 13:32:09 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
18LU20180218 - tco2
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 13:32:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
18LU20180218 - alkalinity
All TA data flagged bad.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 13:33:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
18LU20180218 - phosphate
Even with 18DD20080813 there seems to be a clear offset. For this cruise the crs
analysis evidence is too strong to be ignored. Adjust conservatively 3% upward.
Supported by CANYONB comparison as well.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 13:31:42 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
18LU20180218 - nitrate
Crossover offset show a robust offset constant in depth of about 3%. Further an
offset is supported by the CANYONB comparison (showing a 2% offset). Adjust
according to the weighted mean upwards.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 13:31:28 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
18LU20180218 - phosphate
Even with 18DD20080813 there seems to be a clear offset. For this cruise the crs
analysis evidence is too strong to be ignored. Adjust conservatively 3% upward.
Supported by CANYONB comparison as well.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 13:31:42 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
18LU20180218 - silicate
Given the high consistency for SiOH4 within the Line-P a small adjustment seems
appropriate in this case. All crs and the CANYONB comparison agree on that.
Adjust upward.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 13:31:54 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
18LU20180218 - oxygen
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 13:32:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 9 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
18LU20180218
nitrate adjustment modified to 2% because the crossovers are somewhat biased by
one outlying profile
Posted by siv.lauvset@uib.no on 2021-04-20 05:36:48 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18LU20180218 - alkalinity
All TA data flagged bad.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 13:33:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18LU20180218 - oxygen
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 13:32:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18LU20180218 - tco2
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 13:32:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18LU20180218 - salinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 13:32:09 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18LU20180218 - silicate
Given the high consistency for SiOH4 within the Line-P a small adjustment seems
appropriate in this case. All crs and the CANYONB comparison agree on that.
Adjust upward.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 13:31:54 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18LU20180218 - phosphate
Even with 18DD20080813 there seems to be a clear offset. For this cruise the crs
analysis evidence is too strong to be ignored. Adjust conservatively 3% upward.
Supported by CANYONB comparison as well.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 13:31:42 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18LU20180218 - nitrate
Crossover offset show a robust offset constant in depth of about 3%. Further an
offset is supported by the CANYONB comparison (showing a 2% offset). Adjust
according to the weighted mean upwards.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 13:31:28 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18LU20180218 - initialized
original: 18LU20180218; Sir Wilfrid Laurier; Marie Robert
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 09:11:43 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments