Cruise: 18DD20190205 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2021.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: 18DD20190205; 18DD20190205
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2021!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
co2_comparison_18DD20190205_unadj.png | View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:10
cruise:1
nitrate:9
oxygen:10
phosphate:8
salinity:10
silicate:9
tco2:10
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
18DD20190205 - salinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:29:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
18DD20190205 - tco2
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:29:08 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
18DD20190205 - alkalinity
Crs strongly influenced by one low concentration profile. The other two profiles
seem to fit just right with surrounding data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:28:35 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
18DD20190205 - phosphate
Likely this cruise has too low PO4 concentrations based on the crs analysis.
Most cruises (esp more recent ones) show an offset between 2% - 4%. However e.g.
there is a nice fit with 18DD200808… Further, the comparison to CANYONB
indicates a 2% offset. Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:28:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
18DD20190205 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:29:14 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
18DD20190205 - phosphate
Likely this cruise has too low PO4 concentrations based on the crs analysis.
Most cruises (esp more recent ones) show an offset between 2% - 4%. However e.g.
there is a nice fit with 18DD200808… Further, the comparison to CANYONB
indicates a 2% offset. Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:28:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
18DD20190205 - silicate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:29:19 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
18DD20190205 - oxygen
Crs offsets are misleading especially since deepest samples are not taking into
consideration for the calculation. Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:28:45 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 9 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
18DD20190205
Seems to be a clear offset so agreed on adjustment at RG meeting. This is
consistent with our method
Posted by siv.lauvset@uib.no on 2021-04-20 05:26:47 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20190205 - silicate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:29:19 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20190205 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:29:14 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20190205 - tco2
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:29:08 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20190205 - salinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:29:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20190205 - phosphate
Likely this cruise has too low PO4 concentrations based on the crs analysis.
Most cruises (esp more recent ones) show an offset between 2% - 4%. However e.g.
there is a nice fit with 18DD200808… Further, the comparison to CANYONB
indicates a 2% offset. Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:28:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20190205 - oxygen
Crs offsets are misleading especially since deepest samples are not taking into
consideration for the calculation. Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:28:45 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20190205 - alkalinity
Crs strongly influenced by one low concentration profile. The other two profiles
seem to fit just right with surrounding data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:28:35 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20190205 - initialized
original: 18DD20190205; John P. Tully; Marie Robert
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 09:11:43 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments