Cruise: 18DD20170604 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2021.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: 18DD20170604; 18DD20170604
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2021!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
co2_comparison_18DD20170604_unadj.png | View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:10
cruise:1
nitrate:9
oxygen:10
phosphate:9
salinity:10
silicate:10
tco2:10
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
18DD20170604 - salinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:20:54 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
18DD20170604 - tco2
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:20:58 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
18DD20170604 - alkalinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:21:02 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
18DD20170604 - phosphate
Likely this cruise has too low PO4 concentrations based on the crs analysis.
Most cruises (esp more recent ones) show an offset between 2% - 4%. However e.g.
there is a nice fit with 18DD200808… Further, the comparison to CANYONB only
indicates a 1% offset. Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:20:33 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
18DD20170604 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:21:08 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
18DD20170604 - phosphate
Likely this cruise has too low PO4 concentrations based on the crs analysis.
Most cruises (esp more recent ones) show an offset between 2% - 4%. However e.g.
there is a nice fit with 18DD200808… Further, the comparison to CANYONB only
indicates a 1% offset. Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:20:33 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
18DD20170604 - silicate
Given the good fit for almost all other Line-P data a small adjustment might be
justified in this case. Offsets are constant with depth shown with all crs and
also visible in CANYONB comparisons. Adjust upward.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:20:44 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
18DD20170604 - oxygen
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:21:12 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 8 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
18DD20170604 - oxygen
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:21:12 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20170604 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:21:08 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20170604 - alkalinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:21:02 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20170604 - tco2
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:20:58 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20170604 - salinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:20:54 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20170604 - silicate
Given the good fit for almost all other Line-P data a small adjustment might be
justified in this case. Offsets are constant with depth shown with all crs and
also visible in CANYONB comparisons. Adjust upward.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:20:44 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20170604 - phosphate
Likely this cruise has too low PO4 concentrations based on the crs analysis.
Most cruises (esp more recent ones) show an offset between 2% - 4%. However e.g.
there is a nice fit with 18DD200808… Further, the comparison to CANYONB only
indicates a 1% offset. Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:20:33 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20170604 - initialized
original: 18DD20170604; John P. Tully; Marie Robert
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 09:11:43 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments