Cruise: 18DD20170205 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2021.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: 18DD20170205; 18DD20170205
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2021!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
co2_comparison_18DD20170205_unadj.png | View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:10
cruise:1
nitrate:9
oxygen:10
phosphate:9
salinity:10
silicate:10
tco2:10
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
18DD20170205 - salinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:10:51 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
18DD20170205 - tco2
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:10:56 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
18DD20170205 - alkalinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:11:00 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
18DD20170205 - phosphate
Likely this cruise has too low PO4 concentrations based on the crs analysis.
Most cruises (esp more recent ones) show an offset between 2% - 4%. However e.g.
there is a nice fit with 18DD200808… Further, the comparison to CANYONB does
also indicate a 2% offset, i.e. on the limit. Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:10:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
18DD20170205 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:11:04 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
18DD20170205 - phosphate
Likely this cruise has too low PO4 concentrations based on the crs analysis.
Most cruises (esp more recent ones) show an offset between 2% - 4%. However e.g.
there is a nice fit with 18DD200808… Further, the comparison to CANYONB does
also indicate a 2% offset, i.e. on the limit. Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:10:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
18DD20170205 - silicate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:11:11 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
18DD20170205 - oxygen
There are quite a bunch of (trustworthy) crs which do show a large (about 3%)
offset. However, many weighted means are also a bit misleading and negatively
influence the the total outcome. Further the CANYBONB comparison gives no reason
to believe that O2 is not accurate. All in all not enough for an adjustment.
Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:10:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 8 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
18DD20170205 - silicate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:11:11 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20170205 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:11:04 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20170205 - alkalinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:11:00 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20170205 - tco2
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:10:56 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20170205 - salinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:10:51 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20170205 - phosphate
Likely this cruise has too low PO4 concentrations based on the crs analysis.
Most cruises (esp more recent ones) show an offset between 2% - 4%. However e.g.
there is a nice fit with 18DD200808… Further, the comparison to CANYONB does
also indicate a 2% offset, i.e. on the limit. Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:10:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20170205 - oxygen
There are quite a bunch of (trustworthy) crs which do show a large (about 3%)
offset. However, many weighted means are also a bit misleading and negatively
influence the the total outcome. Further the CANYBONB comparison gives no reason
to believe that O2 is not accurate. All in all not enough for an adjustment.
Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 12:10:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20170205 - initialized
original: 18DD20170205; John P. Tully; Marie Robert
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 09:11:43 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments