Cruise: 18DD20160208 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2021.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: 18DD20160208; 18DD20160208
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2021!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
co2_comparison_18DD20160208_unadj.png | View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:10
cruise:1
nitrate:9
oxygen:10
phosphate:9
salinity:10
silicate:10
tco2:10
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
18DD20160208 - salinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 11:12:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
18DD20160208 - tco2
Weighted mean offset is a bit misleading as samples at depth fit well with
historical data. Especially at two depth levels (sigma 4= 45.75 - 45.8) offsets
become relatively large ( about 5- 10 umol/kg) however. Comparisons to CANYONB
samples also indicate too low concentrations (especially at those depths...).
Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 11:11:48 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
18DD20160208 - alkalinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 11:12:19 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
18DD20160208 - phosphate
Likely this cruise has too low PO4 concentrations based on the crs analysis.
Most cruises (esp more recent ones) show an offset between 2% - 4%. However e.g.
there is a nice fit with 18DD200808… Further, the CANYONB comparisons also
indicates 2% low data. Note that all cruises younger 2010 seem to have low PO4
concentrations compared to historical data... Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 11:12:02 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
18DD20160208 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 11:12:23 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
18DD20160208 - phosphate
Likely this cruise has too low PO4 concentrations based on the crs analysis.
Most cruises (esp more recent ones) show an offset between 2% - 4%. However e.g.
there is a nice fit with 18DD200808… Further, the CANYONB comparisons also
indicates 2% low data. Note that all cruises younger 2010 seem to have low PO4
concentrations compared to historical data... Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 11:12:02 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
18DD20160208 - silicate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 11:12:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
18DD20040218_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20040602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20050211_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20060130_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20060919_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20070530_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20070814_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20080131_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
18DD20080813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
18DD20160208 - oxygen
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 11:12:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 8 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
18DD20160208 - oxygen
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 11:12:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20160208 - silicate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 11:12:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20160208 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 11:12:23 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20160208 - alkalinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 11:12:19 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20160208 - salinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 11:12:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20160208 - phosphate
Likely this cruise has too low PO4 concentrations based on the crs analysis.
Most cruises (esp more recent ones) show an offset between 2% - 4%. However e.g.
there is a nice fit with 18DD200808… Further, the CANYONB comparisons also
indicates 2% low data. Note that all cruises younger 2010 seem to have low PO4
concentrations compared to historical data... Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 11:12:02 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20160208 - tco2
Weighted mean offset is a bit misleading as samples at depth fit well with
historical data. Especially at two depth levels (sigma 4= 45.75 - 45.8) offsets
become relatively large ( about 5- 10 umol/kg) however. Comparisons to CANYONB
samples also indicate too low concentrations (especially at those depths...).
Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 11:11:48 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
18DD20160208 - initialized
original: 18DD20160208; John P. Tully; Marie Robert
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2021-04-14 09:11:43 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments