Cruise: 06AQ19920521 (dataset:CARBOOCEAN) Data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023 Predecessor: CARINA
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: 06AQANTX_4; WOCE A12; 06AQ19920521; 06AQANTX_4; WOCE A12; a12sv; A12
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This is the published adjustment version (GLODAPv2.2021) from GLODAPv2.2020! Click here to view previous (immutable) version (GLODAPv2.2020)
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
offsets.png | [autogenerated from RC_Are/adjustments!] |
View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
cruise:1
nitrate:22
oxygen:30
phosphate:20
salinity:34
silicate:29
tco2:17
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_06AQ19860627_06AQ19920521_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19890906_06AQ19920521_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19901117_06AQ19920521_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ19921203_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ19960317_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ19980328_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ20021124_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ20050122_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ20060825_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ20071128_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ20080210_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ20101128_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06MT19900123_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_29HE20100208_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_316N19831007_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_316N19831113_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_33RO20100308_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_35A319950222_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_35MF20080207_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_740H20081226_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_90AV20041104_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_90MS19811009_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
xover_sum_06AQ19920521_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 90MS19811009!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/salinity!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 74JC19950320!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/salinity!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 35A319950222!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/salinity!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 316N19831113!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/salinity!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 316N19831007!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/salinity!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 316N19720718.7!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/salinity!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 06MT19900123 / 06AQ19920521!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/salinity!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 06AQ19960317!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/salinity!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 06AQ19921203!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/salinity!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 06AQ19890906!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/salinity!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 06AQ19860627!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - salinity
maintain 0
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-07 22:17:07 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521/salinity: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521/salinity: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - salinity
The inversion suggest a correction of 3.63 ppm, based on 9 crossovers with a
mean offset of -2.573. Do not adjust. This is consistent with CARINA.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-08-31 09:58:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - salinity
Average of all cross-overs is: -2.5
Inversion analysis suggests an insignificant adjustment.
Cross-overs with other core cruises do not warrant an adjustment.
13 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-13 12:07:48 UTC for data product: CARINA
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_salinity in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
06AQ19920521 - tco2
maintain 0
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-07 22:17:25 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - tco2
Mean offset is +5.5 but this is strongly biased by 2 too high cruises. We follow
CARINA with NO adjustment and confirm GLODAPv1.
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-16 13:49:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - tco2
06AQ19920521 689
tco2
There are 5 xovers. The fitted offset is -2.9. The suggested adjustment is 0
All residuals fits very close to 0 and keep inside +-5.
Very good fit with 4 GLODAP cruises
Vigo 2008/06/10
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-12 11:14:00 UTC for data product: CARINA
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
06AQ19920521 - phosphate
revert to 1.00. Cruise does not appear to be more than 1% offset, which is well
within limits (inversion believes 0.991 is in order).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-07 22:25:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - phosphate
Earlier decision of giving an adjustment of 0.98 is confirmed by new inversion
for phosphate in the Atlantic with 10 core cruises assigned.
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-23 15:02:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - phosphate
Suggested correction is 0.995, and mean offset 1.005. OK, but particularly low
vs. 316N1983113, which is high. This is not consistent with CARINA (0.98) nor
with GLODAP 0.019 low. Use CARINA adjustment.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-10 21:23:18 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - phosphate
Average of all cross-overs is: 0.988
Inversion analysis suggests an adjustment of: 0.959
Core cruises (e.g. 316N19831007) tend to show no difference with 06AQ19920521
At the Paris meeting we agreed to apply NO adjustment to phosphate of cruise
06AQ19920521.
25 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema
-
UPDATE
A new inversion analysis has been done (13 Oct. 2008), now with data to which
all suggested adjustments from the first round were applied. This new analysis
suggests a significant adjustment of phosphate by 0.98
Comparing regional cross-overs a small adjustment seems justified.
Therefore, I suggest an adjustment of phosphate by 0.98
28 October 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-09 14:00:01 UTC for data product: CARINA
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
06AQ19920521 - nitrate
make 0.99. That brings it nicely in line with AQ2010
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-07 22:26:07 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - nitrate
Suggested correction is 0.99, and MO is 1.027. No adjustment recommended from
our analysis. This is inconsistent with CARINA data who suggested adjustment of
0.98. Here we use the CARINA recommendation.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-08-31 15:01:12 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - nitrate
Average of all cross-overs is: 1.037
Inversion analysis suggests an adjustment of: 0.969
Core cruises tend to show less difference with 06AQ19920521
Therefore I suggest the minimum adjustment of nitrate for cruise 06AQ19920521
amounting to 0.98
9 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-09 13:35:43 UTC for data product: CARINA
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
06AQ19920521 - phosphate
revert to 1.00. Cruise does not appear to be more than 1% offset, which is well
within limits (inversion believes 0.991 is in order).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-07 22:25:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - phosphate
Earlier decision of giving an adjustment of 0.98 is confirmed by new inversion
for phosphate in the Atlantic with 10 core cruises assigned.
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-23 15:02:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - phosphate
Suggested correction is 0.995, and mean offset 1.005. OK, but particularly low
vs. 316N1983113, which is high. This is not consistent with CARINA (0.98) nor
with GLODAP 0.019 low. Use CARINA adjustment.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-10 21:23:18 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - phosphate
Average of all cross-overs is: 0.988
Inversion analysis suggests an adjustment of: 0.959
Core cruises (e.g. 316N19831007) tend to show no difference with 06AQ19920521
At the Paris meeting we agreed to apply NO adjustment to phosphate of cruise
06AQ19920521.
25 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema
-
UPDATE
A new inversion analysis has been done (13 Oct. 2008), now with data to which
all suggested adjustments from the first round were applied. This new analysis
suggests a significant adjustment of phosphate by 0.98
Comparing regional cross-overs a small adjustment seems justified.
Therefore, I suggest an adjustment of phosphate by 0.98
28 October 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-09 14:00:01 UTC for data product: CARINA
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_06AQ19860627_06AQ19920521_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19890906_06AQ19920521_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19901117_06AQ19920521_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ19921203_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ19960317_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ19980328_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ20021124_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ20050122_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ20060825_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ20080210_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ20101128_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06MT19900123_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_29HE20100208_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_316N19831007_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_316N19831113_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_33RO20100308_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_35A319950222_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_35MF20080207_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_740H20081226_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_90AV20041104_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
xover_sum_06AQ19920521_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 35A319950222!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/silicate!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 316N19831113!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/silicate!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 316N19831007!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/silicate!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 06MT19900123 / 06AQ19920521!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/silicate!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 06AQ19960317!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/silicate!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 06AQ19921203!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/silicate!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 06AQ19890906!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/silicate!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 06AQ19860627!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
06AQ19920521 - silicate
make 0.99.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-07 22:27:09 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - silicate
The inversion suggest a correction of 0.9923 and mean offset is 1.048, but this
offset is massive due to crossover with (3700) 316N19831113, which are poor,
according to CARINA. Initially noo adjustment is recommended. This is
inconsistent with CARINA which suggested x 0.98. From the offsets the data looks
a bit high, so I am not opposed to the CARINA suggested adjustment. In the end,
follow CARINA recommendation.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-13 20:32:09 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - silicate
Average of all cross-overs is: 1.075 (but this value is strongly influenced by
an anomalously high cross-over with cruise 316N19831113)
Inversion analysis appears to be strongly influenced by this.
Comparison with core cruises and other reliable cruises tends to show silicate
of 06AQ19920521 to be somewhat on the high side.
I suggest an adjustment of silicate for cruise 06AQ19920521 of 0.98
9 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-09 14:11:10 UTC for data product: CARINA
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_06AQ19860627_06AQ19920521_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19890906_06AQ19920521_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19901117_06AQ19920521_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ19921203_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ19960317_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ19980328_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ20021124_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ20050122_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ20060825_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ20071128_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ20080210_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06AQ20101128_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_06MT19900123_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_29HE20100208_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_316N19831007_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_316N19831113_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_33RO20100308_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_35A319950222_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_35MF20080207_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_740H20081226_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06AQ19920521_90AV20041104_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
xover_sum_06AQ19920521_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 35A319950222!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 316N19831113!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 316N19831007!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 06MT19900123 / 06AQ19920521!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 06AQ19960317!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 06AQ19921203!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 06AQ19890906!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xover.png | [Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 06AQ19920521 / 06AQ19860627!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - oxygen
maintain 1.00. Stations south of 50S (i.e., 571-644) are accurate. Stations
north of 50S (i.e., 536-570) have an increasing bias, reaching +4% near
capetown. These data are flagged BAD (-777) in the first station range. See
figures OXY_change_06AQ19980328_06AQ19920521.pdf and
OXY_change_35MF20080207_06AQ19920521.pdf
(will be uploaded later)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-07 22:28:30 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521/oxygen: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521/oxygen: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - oxygen
The inversion suggest a correction of 0.9907, based on 8 crossovers with a mean
offset of 1.014. This looks high. Initially recommend adjustment of 0.99.
However, this is not consistent with CARINA suggesting no adjustment, follow
CARINA recommendation.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-17 13:16:32 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - oxygen
Average of all cross-overs is: 1.018
Inversion analysis suggests no significant adjustment (0.999)
Based on this I suggest to follow the inversion result and thus NO adjustment of
oxygen for cruise 06AQ19920521
9 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-09 14:24:11 UTC for data product: CARINA
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_oxygen in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 25 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - oxygen
maintain 1.00. Stations south of 50S (i.e., 571-644) are accurate. Stations
north of 50S (i.e., 536-570) have an increasing bias, reaching +4% near
capetown. These data are flagged BAD (-777) in the first station range. See
figures OXY_change_06AQ19980328_06AQ19920521.pdf and
OXY_change_35MF20080207_06AQ19920521.pdf
(will be uploaded later)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-07 22:28:30 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - silicate
make 0.99.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-07 22:27:09 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - nitrate
make 0.99. That brings it nicely in line with AQ2010
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-07 22:26:07 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - phosphate
revert to 1.00. Cruise does not appear to be more than 1% offset, which is well
within limits (inversion believes 0.991 is in order).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-07 22:25:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - tco2
maintain 0
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-07 22:17:25 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - salinity
maintain 0
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-07 22:17:07 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521/oxygen: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521/salinity: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521/oxygen: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521/salinity: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - phosphate
Earlier decision of giving an adjustment of 0.98 is confirmed by new inversion
for phosphate in the Atlantic with 10 core cruises assigned.
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-23 15:02:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - tco2
Mean offset is +5.5 but this is strongly biased by 2 too high cruises. We follow
CARINA with NO adjustment and confirm GLODAPv1.
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-16 13:49:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - oxygen
The inversion suggest a correction of 0.9907, based on 8 crossovers with a mean
offset of 1.014. This looks high. Initially recommend adjustment of 0.99.
However, this is not consistent with CARINA suggesting no adjustment, follow
CARINA recommendation.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-17 13:16:32 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - silicate
The inversion suggest a correction of 0.9923 and mean offset is 1.048, but this
offset is massive due to crossover with (3700) 316N19831113, which are poor,
according to CARINA. Initially noo adjustment is recommended. This is
inconsistent with CARINA which suggested x 0.98. From the offsets the data looks
a bit high, so I am not opposed to the CARINA suggested adjustment. In the end,
follow CARINA recommendation.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-13 20:32:09 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - phosphate
Suggested correction is 0.995, and mean offset 1.005. OK, but particularly low
vs. 316N1983113, which is high. This is not consistent with CARINA (0.98) nor
with GLODAP 0.019 low. Use CARINA adjustment.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-10 21:23:18 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - nitrate
Suggested correction is 0.99, and MO is 1.027. No adjustment recommended from
our analysis. This is inconsistent with CARINA data who suggested adjustment of
0.98. Here we use the CARINA recommendation.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-08-31 15:01:12 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - salinity
The inversion suggest a correction of 3.63 ppm, based on 9 crossovers with a
mean offset of -2.573. Do not adjust. This is consistent with CARINA.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-08-31 09:58:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06AQ19920521 - salinity
Average of all cross-overs is: -2.5
Inversion analysis suggests an insignificant adjustment.
Cross-overs with other core cruises do not warrant an adjustment.
13 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-13 12:07:48 UTC for data product: CARINA
06AQ19920521 - tco2
06AQ19920521 689
tco2
There are 5 xovers. The fitted offset is -2.9. The suggested adjustment is 0
All residuals fits very close to 0 and keep inside +-5.
Very good fit with 4 GLODAP cruises
Vigo 2008/06/10
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-12 11:14:00 UTC for data product: CARINA
06AQ19920521 - oxygen
Average of all cross-overs is: 1.018
Inversion analysis suggests no significant adjustment (0.999)
Based on this I suggest to follow the inversion result and thus NO adjustment of
oxygen for cruise 06AQ19920521
9 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-09 14:24:11 UTC for data product: CARINA
06AQ19920521 - silicate
Average of all cross-overs is: 1.075 (but this value is strongly influenced by
an anomalously high cross-over with cruise 316N19831113)
Inversion analysis appears to be strongly influenced by this.
Comparison with core cruises and other reliable cruises tends to show silicate
of 06AQ19920521 to be somewhat on the high side.
I suggest an adjustment of silicate for cruise 06AQ19920521 of 0.98
9 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-09 14:11:10 UTC for data product: CARINA
06AQ19920521 - phosphate
Average of all cross-overs is: 0.988
Inversion analysis suggests an adjustment of: 0.959
Core cruises (e.g. 316N19831007) tend to show no difference with 06AQ19920521
At the Paris meeting we agreed to apply NO adjustment to phosphate of cruise
06AQ19920521.
25 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema
-
UPDATE
A new inversion analysis has been done (13 Oct. 2008), now with data to which
all suggested adjustments from the first round were applied. This new analysis
suggests a significant adjustment of phosphate by 0.98
Comparing regional cross-overs a small adjustment seems justified.
Therefore, I suggest an adjustment of phosphate by 0.98
28 October 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-09 14:00:01 UTC for data product: CARINA
06AQ19920521 - nitrate
Average of all cross-overs is: 1.037
Inversion analysis suggests an adjustment of: 0.969
Core cruises tend to show less difference with 06AQ19920521
Therefore I suggest the minimum adjustment of nitrate for cruise 06AQ19920521
amounting to 0.98
9 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-09 13:35:43 UTC for data product: CARINA
Hide comments